jadensababe505 jadensababe505
  • 22-05-2018
  • Social Studies
contestada

When warning users about the dangers of products, writers should avoid using mandatory language such as must and shall?

Respuesta :

andriansp andriansp
  • 31-05-2018
I believe the answer is: False

Mandatory language is actually advisable to be used in this situation.
Using mandatory language would set a clear limitation that make the consumers understand the magnitude of the danger. This would make them much more likely to follow the written warning.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Subway I 8 out of 11 people are carrying a briefcase based on this information if there are 700 people on a subway then about how many do not have a briefcase
In foreign affairs, Cardinal Richelieu of France A: aided the protestant cause during the Thirty Years' War B: supported the Catholic Counter-Reformation C: tri
Fads never die out. true or false
can someome explain to me how to do 16 and 17? Thank you so much!
Describe the causes and progress of the war in korea
Which type of jurisdiction do federal trial courts have
There IS one requirement that must be met for a fuel to be considered a biofuel. That is? A) the starting material must be CO2 that can be fixed or turned into
How do you balance a chemical equation?
-7x+9y=257x+y=-5 how do I do this
How does setting a specific timeframe in which to complete a goal increase the chances of the goal being met?